Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nutritional Science and Sound Scientific Reasoning
The purpose of this final paper is to apply nutritional science and sound scientific reasoning
to an analysis of a relevant nutrition-related topic. Consider a topic that is of interest to you
that is relevant to nutritional science. As you conduct your research it will be important that
you consider the sources of your information and whether or not they are reliable and
credible. There is a great deal of information on nutrition, some of it reliable, some of it
unreliable or misleading; and while the internet is a wonderful resource for research, it
contains a tremendous amount of questionable and/or unreliable information that sounds
science-based but is not. Thus, it is very important you examine and establish the credibility
of the research you use.
Length must be 4-6
double-spaced pages (NOT including the title and reference pages). A minimum of 3
scholarly references must be used for this paper. Use standard margins and 12 font, Times
New Roman.
Use the critical thinking and science-based writing skills we practice(d) throughout the term in
this paper. Take time to carefully review the Final Paper Rubric which provides specific
criteria that defines how your work will be graded. As you do that, keep in mind specific
segments of the rubric address both the content and process elements of the paper, and it is
important you cover the areas discussed. In other words, be sure that you carefully review
and understand each rubric segment and that you address all areas as you write your final
paper.
Final Research Paper
Final Research Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLibrary Research-Are the articles scholarly?
-Are the articles relevant and timely to the subject?
-Are there a minimum of three scholarly articles and/or books assigned per the final paper guidelines?
20 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentAnalysis and relevance: Use of the research
55 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat-Does the cover page include the student’s name, assignment title, University Course Number, date, and professor’s name?
-Is the paper spacing, indent, fonts, and margins consistent with APA formatting?
-Are the pages numbered?
5 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting• Are all sources that are cited in this paper included in the reference list?
10 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle• Is the writing clear, grammatically and mechanically correct?
10 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Nutritional Science and Sound Scientific Reasoning |
Nutritional Science and Sound Scientific Reasoning