Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Week 7 Discussion
Please read the story in the following link and follow the directions below:
https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/who-we-are/features/tbpreventivetherapy.html
Provide a brief summary of the story.
Identify and discuss the *global partnerships that contributed to the success of the endeavor. Include which sustainable goal is addressed with this effort or organization.
Then, respond to the following questions
1. How can poor countries with resource limitations be held to the same human rights standards as rich countries?
2. Is there an obligation of international cooperation? Explain
3. What are governmental human rights obligations in society? Explain
Please ensure you are following the discussion rubric and including a nursing, scholarly journal article in addition to your text book as sources of support.
* Global Partnership Examples:
Foreign governments and ministries of health
U.S. government agencies
The World Health Organization
International organizations
Academic institutions
Foundations
Nongovernmental organizations
Faith-based organizations
Businesses and other private organizations
References:
1. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/who-we-are/features/tbpreventivetherapy.html
2. Introduction to global health 3rd edition by Kathryn H. Jacobsen ISBN: 9781284123890
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Obligation of International Cooperation |
Obligation of International Cooperation