Older Workers’ Social Media Usage Case Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Older Workers’ Social Media Usage Case Essay
Purpose and Nature of the Test
Answers the following questions:
- What does the test measure? (Include scales.)
The effect of older workers’ social media usage at work on their workability
The scales used include Self-Efficacy and Work Ability, and Willingness to Delay Retirement.
Form of a Likert 7-point scale
- What does the test predict?
The test predicts the willingness of older workers to delay retirement
- What behavior does the test require the test taker to perform?
The test takers were required to answer a questionnaire.
- What population was the test designed for?
The population was designed for staff older than 55 years
- What is the nature of the test?
Objective test
- What is the format of the test?
Short answer test
Practical Evaluation
Answers the following questions:
- If you have access to a test manual, is it comprehensive? (I assume that most of you will not have access to a test manual–that is fine.)
Yes, the test is comprehensive.
- How easy or difficult is the test to administer?
The test is quite complex to administer, considering that data collection is done online. This means that variation on the response by the tests takers is inevitable.
- How clear are the administration directions?
The administration directions are quite clear and easy to follow when conducting the tests.
- How clear are the scoring procedures?
The coring procedures are quite simple, with most of them ranging between 1-7 in terms of the simplest to the most complex. The test takers can answer the tests questions with ease.
- What qualifications and training, if any, does an administrator need to have?
The administrators only need an average literacy level with good analysis and coordination skills. For instance, the administrators needed the skills to analyze data using SPSS and Cronbach alpha tools.
- Does the test have face validity?
Yes, the test has face validity, and it is relevant.
Technical Evaluation
Answers the following questions:
- Is there a norm group? Who comprises it? What types of norms are there?
The research work included a norm group.
The norm group comprised of older persons beyond 55 years that did not use social media.
The social norms available in this research work include the folkways norms.
How was the norm group selected? Are there subgroup norms?
The norm group in this research is selected through the online data collected. Through the online data collected through social media.
- What is the estimate of the test’s reliability? How was reliability determined?
The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency reliability in the presurvey sample, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .902. Test-retest reliability is a consistency measure obtained by administering the same test to a group of people twice over a period. By comparing Time 1 with Time 2, the test’s stability over time can be assessed.
- What is the evidence for the validity of the test? How was validity determined?
Validity is a conclusion reached after a careful study of several sorts of evidence. The measure’s dependability, whether it covers the construct of interest, and whether the scores it generates are linked to other factors that should be correlated with rather than conceptually separate variables are all critical pieces of evidence. The pattern of outcomes over multiple investigations, not a single study, determines the dependability and validity. The process of assessing validity and reliability is still in progress.
- What is the standard error of measurement?
The standard error of measurement (SEM) indicates how a people’s “actual” score is dispersed around repeated measures on the same instrument. Because no measurement accurately represents the genuine score, the correct score will always be unknown. In this case, the measurement has a standard error of measurement of 1.
- What are the confidence intervals?
The confidence of this research is quite low, with an interval of 0.001%.
Test Reviews
Answers at least one of the following questions in a full paragraph with sufficient detail:
- What do reviewers say are the strengths and weaknesses of the test?
One of the study’s strengths is that it focuses on a topic that has received less attention from other researchers. The report could be used to develop a health bonus strategy by appropriate government agencies. The aging of the entire population, particularly in China, needs the creation of a health bonus plan that is in line with national conditions. The findings can also reduce opposition among older people when devising a deferred-retirement strategy. The outcomes of the study indicate that workability and work stress have an impact on older people’s decision to delay retirement.
The study’s weaknesses include the fact that it investigated the impact of social media on older persons’ willingness to retire. While this effect has been proven, social support acquired via social media has only been studied in terms of knowledge and emotional support. The study does not examine the impact of different types of social assistance on older people.
This study does not differentiate across vocations or take into account the many differences between them. The study is still ongoing, and different occupations will be investigated in the future to determine whether there are any variations in older people’s willingness to delay retirement. This research focuses on a subset of China’s senior population in the province of Anhui. It is unclear whether the same outcomes would be achieved in other regions or countries due to cultural variations.
- What studies that used the test as a measurement instrument have been published?
None so far.
- How did the test perform when researchers or test users, other than the test developers, used it?
When the researchers used the test, the standard deviation measurement was quite high than when the test developers used it.