Organic Disorders in Speech Pathology Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Organic Disorders in Speech Pathology Discussion
For this assignment, you are to read the accompanying article “Heilmann-Perspectives-2010” about Language Sample Analysis and talk about your personal feelings on language samples, what you can find out about a client’s language from a sample (what you would be looking for), and what you thought about the article and comments on each of the 7 myths that are debunked in the article.
Cultural Competence Discussion
As a nurse, we have all heard numerous times about cultural competence. Organizations even put it in the mission statements. But achieving cultural competence does not happen overnight. As a nurse executive, you have a dedicated responsibility to see that this is indeed a part of your organization. View the attached document from The Expert Panel on Global Nursing and Health. You do not need to read the whole thing, but pick any one of the 12 standards and write a 1-2 page reflective paper on two barriers to that you foresee to addressing the standard and then make a suggestion or two on how you could start to implement this at your workplace. Each standard has a further explanation your may want to review. Because this is a reflective paper you can use first person I. You do need to type this and double space but APA format is not required for this assignment.
Organic Disorders in Speech Pathology Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow