Paralegal Field Readiness Assessment Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Paralegal Field Readiness Assessment Case Study
Go back and review Assignment #2, your Paralegal Field Readiness assessment that you did of yourself and your strengths and weaknesses. Spend some time reflecting on what you have learned in this course over the last few months, whether matters of law, ethics, or aspects of the legal field you learned about through the interview project or lectures.
In a 2-3 page paper, write about what you have learned this term in this class. Would you change any of your answers in your first assignment now that you’ve completed the course? What courses will you take next term and in the 2021-2022 academic year in order to complete your program (plan it out)? If you are planning to continue on in your legal studies, whether at TNCC or beyond, how will you do so? What suggestions would you make to improve this course or the paralegal program at TNCC?
I have included the pictures of the Paralegal Field Readiness assessment.
Some of the things I learned that you can add in just go more in depth
-the true definition of a paralegal and it’s duties
-More about interview skills
-I learned how to brief a case
-I learned a lot and got a better understanding by playing the icivics game
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results