Parody Film Vampire Suck Movie Analysis
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
This is the prompt I have attached the readings,. lecture notes and will attach the class recordings that will help you answer this prompt 🙂
Prompt: Carefully choose a film that you would consider to be a parody, in Fredric Jamesons terms and one that is a pastiche. Explore the characteristics that differentiate the two films.
Please use all the feedback as usual that I have given you in the past 500-word essay questions I need help with also in terms of writing style here is a classmate’s notes: Jamesons idea of the pastiche/blank parody brought up an important aspect of artmaking in todays work. Truly, everything has been already invented, written, shown, made art of in this world. We are constantly imitating dead styles, but I see this in a different way a bit. Each of us interprets an idea in a specific way. I think that even if we continuously imitate old ideas, each of us has a different way to create something out of it. This brings up the idea of adaptation, where we all start from the same foundation or base, but taking slightly different roads of interpretation, illustration and such. Is there an issue in imitating the dead styles?
Hansen covers an interesting topic, where American happy endings changed into tragic endings for Russian release. I find it an art in itself to find ways in which this American style cinema was distributed around the globe, depending on the genres, the messages that it conveys through this medium. I never really thought about the knowledge that is behind finding the proper audiences for these films around the globe, along with the needed modifications to make them more appropriate for the different nations around the globe. The line recycling the ruins of both classical cinema and modernity connects to Jamesons idea behind the imitation of these dead styles.
Yet, a lot of these styles were somewhat shaped from ruins which created them into something different, depending on what the creators thought it would be fit. Does the viewer realize that these films engage them at a narrative-cognitive level? Do the regular film viewers realize the meaning of optical consciousness?
class recording :
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eQMSX_jPxsCJKgPWX…
Please READ: Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism and Consumer Society (1988) 1031-1041
also there wasn’t any class discussion so there was no second class recording but maybe this link can help you decide on what film https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-pa… to write about pls do not use this link as a resource this is to just help you get an idea to answer the question 🙂
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Parody Film Vampire Suck Movie Analysis
Parody Film Vampire Suck Movie Analysis