Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Peer-Reviewed Research Conference Research Paper
Instructions
For this Assignment, you will apply what you’ve learned in this course, and throughout your time at NCU, by writing and submitting an original research paper to a peer-reviewed research conference. You are able to choose any of the sponsored ACM or IEEE research conferences for submission. The ACM website and IEEE website are great sources for finding conferences and journals that are peer reviewed.
Your paper can take the form of a survey or an original thesis; all kinds of papers meet the criteria for publication.
For this task, you must:
Identify a conference, journal, or magazine that publishes topics in DW and/or DSSs.
Produce a paper that meets the format for submission (please provide the formatting instructions with submission and note these may differ from standard APA report format).
Submit the paper to the conference, journal, or magazine.
Submit your paper with the formatting instructions along with evidence of the paper having been submitted.
Length: 8-10 pages (publication will most likely specify length)
References: minimum of 10-12 peer-reviewed sources
Your response should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Peer-Reviewed Research Conference Research Paper |
Peer-Reviewed Research Conference Research Paper