Philosophy of Science Assignment Help
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
QUESTION:
Why should we avoid the word Prove in science? Discuss by using Popper and Lakatoss views. Give at least one example related to this situation.
GUIDELINES (PLEASE READ THEM VERY CAREFULLY):
1- Above question is a long essay question. You have to answer it in 3-4 paragraphs. No word count.
2- You will be graded according to 3 criteria: i- How well you use our course material; ii- How well you present your own opinion; iii- The basic structure of your essay (for ex: does it have the form intro-body-conclusion ?).
3- Send your answer either in Word or PDF format.
4- If you experience a technical problem during the exam time, apply to BauGO and/or help.bau.edu.tr immediately, and get a ticket for your problem.
5- Our course material will be sufficient for you in your answer. You dont have to use extra resources. If you use extra resources, DONT forget to add footnotes to your essay.
6- Your essays will be checked by programs like Turnitin. So please BE VERY SENSITIVE about not to commit copy-paste or similar types of plagiarism. Plagiarism will be punished VERY severely.
Philosophy of Science Assignment Help
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Philosophy of Science Assignment Help