Policy Intersects with Biology Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Policy Intersects with Biology Discussion Essay
Policy Intersects with Biology Discussion Essay
In at least 100 words, describe how you think that policy intersects with biology. You can make this as broad or specific as you would like! Comment on the responses of at least two of your peers
I think policy intersects biology in a way that it helps keep societies safe because science can be abusive to society by conducting researches that are dangerous to people, without policies, this would mean that a lot of actions
done in the name of science would be unchecked no matter how dangerous it is. Policies also help protect the interests of stakeholders, makes sure that scientists are honest about their work and take responsibility for their work,
policies help scientists treat their subjects with respect and view them as human before trying any inhumane experiments on them. In general, policies help biology progress, function, and stay fair.
I think the relationship between policy and biology is important and interconnected because the foundation of science is based on policy decisions to maintain a sustainable future. To design and build any foundation, it is
important to make a policy. If we take an example of a hospital and people working in the hospital. Everything is interconnected and if there is no policy the system will not cultivate. There are doctors, nurses, technicians, and other
staff working as a chain. The act of policy not only in biology but as a science accounts for decisions to be made best on the challenges that society faces.
Policy Intersects with Biology Discussion Essay
Policy Intersects with Biology Discussion Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow