Political Science Discussion Essay Project

Political Science Discussion Essay Project

Instructions:

Political Science Discussion Essay Project

#1

We read about the Democratic “ideal” in this chapter and discussed if democracy is in fact an ideology.  Democracy can certainly be described in many different ways.  Plato and Aristotle were convinced that democracy was a bad form of government.  Machiavelli argues that the greatest danger to self-government is corruption.  Is there a country that we can argue is an “ideal democracy”? While formulating your answer, consider the following questions: Is the United States a good example of “democratic ideal” or do it fall short? Can you argue that another country is better suited for this title?  Both China and Soviet Union claim to be “people’s democracies”, would you agree? Why or why not?   Explain your position and provide support for your argument.  In making your determination of  which country is an “ideal democracy”, what values did you include, human rights, minority rights, quality of life, economy…??

Reminder:  You must post an answer first before you’re able to read your classmates posts.  Be sure to review the orientation module for the requirements for discussions.  Your response should well written and researched, and your response to your classmates should be just as substantial as your initial post.  One or two sentence responses will not receive credit.  Remember these are graded assignments, correct spelling, punctuation and grammar are taken into consideration.  Please do not use color, bold, special font or headings. There’s no need for a header (do not include your name, my name, class name, date etc.) simply click “reply” and start typing. Your response should be in paragraph form.  No need to retype the questions, I know what they are.  And lastly…. don’t forget to cite your sources..

#2

Below are some of the major topics of debate within International Relations.  Questions of morality, judgement, sovereignty etc. are widely argued within this subset of Political Science.  This week you get to choose your topic from one listed below.  Conduct research on the topic using information from the textbook and/or current events, then argue either for or against while citing examples to support your opinion.  Be sure to use appropriate in-text citations as well as a works cited list.

Should leaders consider moral issues in formulating a state’s foreign policy?

In the mid-1990s the world community stood by as Tutsis slaughtered thousands of Hutus in Rwanda. Should the United Nations become involved in cases of ethnic cleansing or genocide?

If scholars are correct and China becomes a superpower, do you believe US– China relations could develop mistrust similar to that between the United States and the former Soviet Union?

The best way to fight the war on terror is by conventional war.

International organizations such as the United Nations erode state sovereignty

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Political Science Discussion Essay Project

Political Science Discussion Essay Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!