Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Political Science Womens Rights Discussion
True or False: When women run, they win at equal rates as similarly situated men.
True or False: Most scholars of gender and politics believe that voters are to blame for women’s underrepresentation.
True or False: College-age women have lower levels of political ambition than college-age men.
True or False: Policy feedback is the idea that policies shape the attitudes and behavior of the public.
True or False: McDonagh argues that the United States is a “motherless state.”
True or False: Brooks studies the impact of gender stereotypes by analyzing real-world political candidates and real-world election outcomes.
True or False: Individuals in the professions of law, business, education, and political activism are considered to be in the “candidate eligibility pool.”
True or False: Women candidates raise less money than similarly situated male candidates.
True or False: The United States Congress is ranked in the top ten of women’s representation in parliament cross-nationally.
True or False (a gimme): Georgia will have two runoff elections for U.S. Senate in January 2021.
Long answer questions:
Extra Credit (2 points): What is the name of Facebook’s chief operating officer who encourages women to “lean in” to their careers?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Political Science Womens Rights Discussion |
Political Science Womens Rights Discussion