Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Pornography Social Science Discussion Assignment
PORNOGRAPHY
Some parts of the documentaries may be difficult and/or uncomfortable to watch, but its the reality of pornography.
FYI – be careful where you watch thisđź‘€
Over 18: The Question is Not Enough
Porn Factor – How exposure to pornography shapes young people – This is the dcumentary you may have to request access to; let them know it for this class, if given access it will be temporary, so you will want to make sure when you open it you have time to watch it.
Experts Talk about the Effects of Pornography on the Brain
The Truth about Porn
Pornography explained by women
Watch the Most Successful Male Porn Star of All Time Speak Out on Porn
ANSWER IN COMPLETE SENTENCES.
Pornography Social Science Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 Â points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 Â points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 Â points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Pornography Social Science Discussion Assignment |
Pornography Social Science Discussion Assignment