Practicum Experience and Evaluation Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Plan to complete all required practicum hours by tomorrow 8/3/19 before midnight. In APA format Reflect on any feedback you have received from individuals in your practicum setting and complete your own self-reflection as you asses your practicum experience, including your professional growth, during this course. Integrate this evaluation into your final journal entry.
Include the level one and two headers as numbered below and a minimum of three scholarly references
Submit a journal entry for your practicum experiences. In your journal entry:
1) Evaluate your practicum experience for this course
2) Include a reflection on your development as a scholar-practitioner and nurse leader.
3) Also, complete and submit an evaluation of your practicum experiences throughout the DNP Program. Consider how your skills and knowledge have grown in the following areas as you prepare your self-evaluation:
a) Leadership
b) Advanced nursing practice
c) Promoting quality improvement
d) Improving health outcomes
e) Informing health care policy
Review the Practicum Experience Evaluation document found in this weeks Learning Resources for further instructions on what you may include in your evaluation (see attached document)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Practicum Experience and Evaluation Assignment