prisoner exchange in between the US and philippines case study
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
prisoner exchange in between the US and philippines case study
As an immigration officer, you have been assigned to prepare a prisoner exchange between the U.S. and the Philippines.
Explain how you would accomplish this assignment. What are the statutes involved? How would you handle the issues of claims of torture in foreign prisons by US exchange prisoners?
Do you think, there is a need for a treaty between the U.S. and the foreign country for prisoner exchanges? Do prisoner exchanges come under extradition statutes and why?
Your supervisor asks you to produce an opinion paper on the prisoner exchange program, but he or she does not like to read much and restricts your opinion paper to 2- to 3-pages.Create a 2- to 3-page report in a Microsoft Word document that includes the answers to the following questions:
Your paper should cite the statute and analyze the language of the prisoner exchange statute.It should address the US Constitutional 8th Amendment related to cruel and unusual punishment issues. If a treaty is required for prisoner exchanges, explain what information should be included in the treaty that would prevent a US court from violating the treaty?
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow prisoner exchange in between the US and philippines case study
prisoner exchange in between the US and philippines case study