Process Design and Supply Chain Evaluation
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Process Design and Supply Chain Evaluation
Process Design & Supply Chain Evaluation Grading Guide OPS/571 Version 6
2 Individual Assignment: Process Design & Supply Chain Evaluation
Purpose of Assignment
The Process Design and Supply Chains assignment provides students with the opportunity to look at process designs in the context of a familiar process and organization. Students begin with more high level looks at the processes as they currently exist and allows them to familiarize themselves with appropriate tools and matrices to be used in analyses. The summation provides students the opportunity to apply the concepts from process design to their own careers and personal life allowing a realistic application for the information.
Grading Guide
Content Met Partially Met Not Met Comments: The student described the selected company’s supply chain. The student identified an internal process they wish to evaluate. The student selected an appropriate design approach for their chosen process. The student created and included a high-level AS IS process flow chart using an appropriate tool and includes that with the assignment. The student collected data for each step of the process using an appropriate tool and includes that with the assignment. The student evaluates the efficiency and effectiveness of the current process using the data collected. The student determined the areas in need of improvement by using the data collected. The student includes a redesigned process flow chart for an improved process using an appropriate design tool and includes this with their assignment. The student summarizes two items from the improved process and includes methods to apply these to their personal or professional life. The presentation consists of 14 slides and is appropriate for the audience. The presentation includes relevant media and visual aids that are consistent with the content. Total Available Total Earned 7 #/X Presentation Guidelines Met Partially Met Not Met Comments: The presentation uses a proper layout with effective headings, fonts, styles, font sizes, and white spaces. The presentation recognize intellectual property using in-text citations and a reference slide. The presentation includes an introduction and conclusion which previews and reviews major points. The presentation includes major points that are stated clearly, organized logically, and supported by specific details, examples, or analysis. The presentation follows proper rules of grammar and usage including spelling and punctuation. Total Available Total Earned 3 #/X Assignment Total # 10 #/X Additional comments: Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Process Design and Supply Chain Evaluation
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Process Design and Supply Chain Evaluation