Professionals Worry About Disclosing Their True Identities Assignment

March 21, 2022

Professionals Worry About Disclosing Their True Identities Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Professionals Worry About Disclosing Their True Identities Assignment

Self-disclosure is a concern among professional and often discussed during supervision. In a paper, give at least two examples of appropriate and inappropriate self-disclosure.

Review the ethics standard and/or principle associated with self-disclosure on the field of choice. Support your responses from the reading material along with an additional resource. Your response must be submitted in an APA format and include references from the material to support your position. Your response should be a minimum of two pages.

Professionals worry about disclosing their true identities, and this topic is often brought up during supervision. At least two instances of suitable and incorrect self-disclosure should be included in a work.

The ethical norm and/or principle of self-disclosure in the chosen area should be examined. Use the readings and an extra source to back up your claims. APA formatting is required for your answer, as well as citations from the source material. A minimum of two pages is required for your answer.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met