Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Project Management Best Practices, Personal Performance Evaluation
According to Kogon, Blakemore, and Wood (2015), many workers in today’s business climate spend an increasing amount of time working on or managing projects. This assignment is designed to help you understand the key components of the project management process, how to select the best project management methodology for your project, and the abilities you’ll need to lead a successful project. You’ve learned that there are many variables to properly managing a project from your readings and videos for this unit, as well as personal experience for many of you. To achieve project success, the project management technique adopted must represent the needs of the firm. These variables
include the project’s size and complexity, the project management procedure, and the talents required to accomplish the project successfully.
Respond to the following questions in this 4- to 6-page APA-compliant paper (excluding title and reference pages):
Section 1: Overview of Project Management
Describe the factors that may be utilized to select a project management methodology using your unit readings and videos, as well as at least two other sources, which can be from non-scholarly sources.
Determine at least three project management approaches about which you want to learn more. These can be from your personal experience or study. Include, but not limited to, the following approaches in your overview:
This methodology’s main application
Projects for which this methodology is best suited
Assistance with technology is available.
Cost
Formal project management experience or abilities are essential.
Analyze the similarities and contrasts between these three project management approaches. Completing this type of assessment as a project manager can assist you in determining which strategy you should use the next time you lead a project.
Section 2: Analysis and Selection of Personal Projects
Identify any current projects you’ve worked on in the last year, regardless of their size or context. They could be based on professional or personal experience.
You must choose two sorts of projects for this section: one that was successful and one that was failed. You could choose to choose assignments from various areas of your expertise (i.e., one work-related, another from personal experience). Using various types of projects can assist you in comprehending the applications of the Section 1 work you accomplished.
Successful Project – Personal Analysis
Describe the project, including its size, scope, personal/professional aspects, your role, project charter (if applicable), project duration timeframes, and any other important information.
Describe the project management elements and/or methodology that you employed to complete this task. You will benefit from the research you conducted in Section 1.
Make a list of the talents you used to assist the project succeed. Make a list of the abilities you could have utilized to help the project succeed.
Complete an analysis of where you may have been more successful after this review.
Unsuccessful Project Personal Analysis
Describe the project, including its size, scope, personal/professional aspects, your role, project charter (if applicable), project duration timeframes, and any other important information.
Describe the project management elements and/or methodology that you employed to complete this task (s). You will benefit from the research you conducted in Section 1.
Using the research you did in Section 1 and personal reflection, assess the project for areas of weakness.
Using the study you did in Section 1 and personal reflection, determine what abilities were required to overcome the weak areas.
Provide at least two suggestions for improvement, based on your Section 1 study and personal experiences. Include the project’s strengths that were recognized during its successful management.
Project Management Best Practices, Personal Performance Evaluation
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Project Management Best Practices, Personal Performance Evaluation |
Project Management Best Practices, Personal Performance Evaluation