Project Management Lifecycle Methodology (PMLC) Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Project Management Lifecycle Methodology (PMLC) Discussion
Select a Project Management Lifecycle Methodology (PMLC)
Depending on their governing characteristics, differing projects require differing fundamental approaches during planning and execution. For this assignment you are to determine which PMLC Methodology best suits
your project. Using the course materials from this unit as your guide, including the PMLC Summary document, determine which Project Management Lifecycle Methodology should be used for your project, and why.
Note: You may select the Traditional Project Management Methodology if you feel that it is the best choice for your project; however, regardless of which PMLC you choose you must provide justification for your approach and identify challenges that it may face.
Prepare a one- to two-page document explaining which PMLC Methodology, you believe, best suits your project including a justification for your selection. Also include any challenges that you would face if you moved forward with the selected methodology.
Topic Criteria Max Your Points Assessment Using course materials, including the PMLC Summary, assess the strengths / weaknesses of PMLCs vs your project and select the PMLC you will use 25 25 Justify Provide justification for your selection – citing the degree of clarity for both the solution and the goal – provide reasonsing as to why the unchosen options were not appropriate 25 25 Challenges Identify challenges of the chosen methodology – risks, stakeholders, Enterprise Environmental Factors, Organizational Process Assets – that will impede (or help) your project 25 25 Content 1 – 2 Pages – communication of intent, clarity of expression, writing style 25 25 Comment Assignment total 100 100
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Project Management Lifecycle Methodology