Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Projects in Technology Assignment in Computer Science
Part One:
Sunstein (2014) proposed that if many individuals contribute little amounts of money, large projects can be completed. There are several examples of a small group of people taking up a concept and turning it into a substantial development (Bill Gates and Microsoft come to mind).
Describe a good impact on technology and the world as a result of such an action. Were there any drawbacks to the outcomes?
Part Two:
Working in a team atmosphere necessitates contributing to a project. Consider the following scenario: you’re interviewing for a job and you’re asked to discuss your prior team contributions in an ethical framework.
How can you best demonstrate your ability to operate as part of a team while remaining ethical?
Investigate proper interview methods and determine which one will best represent your expertise in this field.
C.R. Sunstein, C.R. Sunstein, C.R. Sunstein (2014). A brief guide to nudging. Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 583-588, doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1
Projects in Technology Assignment in Computer Science
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Projects in Technology Assignment in Computer Science