Promoting A Racial or Ethnic Minority Employee Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Promoting A Racial or Ethnic Minority Employee Discussion
DISCUSSION REPLY
In preparing your replies, consider only the personnel issues in question #3 of the initial thread. Reply to classmates who reached a different conclusion than you did regarding the involvement of Marvin, Kelsey, and Carlos. Identify the points of difference in your analyses and explain how your application of the relevant law (man’s or God’s) to the facts of this situation led you to a different conclusion.
Then, assume that Shania opened her coffeehouse and became so successful that she now has 20 employees and needs to promote 1 of them to be the night shift supervisor. The employee base is quite diverse and Shania believes she should promote a racial or ethnic minority employee to demonstrate how inclusive her business has become. Explore the legal, Biblical, and ethical issues if Shania makes her promotion decision entirely on that basis. What are her options?
Both of your replies should address the promotion question.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results