project management software
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Proposal and Plan using project management software
Task
You are required to prepare for this Assessment Item by:
- READING the Subject outline,
- COMPLETING Topic 2 Project Planning
- BUILDING your PLAN up from the Project Title and Abstract in Assessment Task 1
WHAT TO DO:
- Follow the Study Schedule and work with the Topics in Interact as they provide a “scaffold” for your learning in this subject.
- Develop a detailed Capstone Project Proposal and Plan using project management software (as listed in the Study Schedule) and the skills you have acquired from IT Project Management to develop a project plan with a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), milestones and Gantt chart. These tools may help.
- MicrosoftProject Pro (http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/project/);
- Open source tools like GanttProject (http://www.ganttproject.biz/);
- OpenProj(http://sourceforge.net/projects/openproj/)
- OpenProject (https://www.openproject.org/about).
- ProjectLibre (http://www.projectlibre.org/)
- Begin using the ‘project blog’ as a tool beyond the weekly progress reportsfor your chosen emerging technology topic:
- The blog helps you to “think by writing” and also store your notes, project files and links in a cloud-based service.
- Consider sharing the site with your peers as a way to tell a story and harness each other’s knowledge.
- The blog is ideally updated each week with 3 or 4 entries for documenting your project notes and as the foundation for editing and writing the Capstone Project Report. An ideal blog entry will have around 50-150 words (150-600 words a week).
Presentation
Project Plan Sample Format (subject to change or modified to include systems development projects)
- Title: Emerging Technology and Innovation Topic
- Project Blog ( Web address provided)
- Weekly Progress Reports Plan (In class, Discussion Board or Project Blog entries)
- Rationale
- Problem domain
- Purpose and justification
- Supervisor Approval
- Research Questions
- Conceptual or Theoretical Framework
- Methodology
- Analysis of sources of information (EndNote, APA Referencing Style)
- Research method(s)
- Data collection or systems design methods
- Ethical Issues
- Compliance Requirements (Workplace, Industry or Government regulations)
- Project Plan
- Deliverables ( Annotated Bibliography, Journal Paper, Report, Seminar)
- Work breakdown structure (WBS)
- Risk Analysis
- Duration
- Gantt chart
- References
- Appendix (if required)
Proposal and Plan using project management software
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results