PS 205 Child Development Discussion Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
PS 205 Child Development Discussion Paper
I’m stuck on a Psychology question and need an explanation.
Advancing in Cognitive Development – Please view all three of the following videos, view it, and respond to the questions below them based on cognitive development and educational curriculum recommendations:
Advancing in Cognitive Development Videos
4.5 year-old (pre-operational) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
6 year-old (transitional) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
8 year-old (fully concrete operational) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Cognitive Development Questions. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Answer the following questions concerning the above videos paying close attention to the child’s explanations for his/her answers.
How could a child understand arithmetic or basic science if they believe that the quantity – the amount of a thing – changes, depending on its current shape, or position, or arrangement?
Should we attempt to teach conservation of quantities to younger children, to accelerate their cognitive development, or should we wait until it develops naturally and let them discover it for themselves? Why, or why not?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow PS 205 Child Development Discussion Paper
PS 205 Child Development Discussion Paper