Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PSY311 Psychology Project Discussion
Applicating the Project: Stress and Coping Ecological Model & Network Analysis
You’ll use the following resources to deepen and demonstrate your understanding of the ecological model of stress and coping, as well as network analysis:
Stress and coping in an ecological model (handout)
a set of network analysis questions
Continue on:
Consider what you’ve learned about stress and coping from the text. Use what you’ve learned to complete the diagram on the handout, which shows the components of stress and coping in the context of your social issue. Apply these elements to your chosen community.
Consider what you’ve learned about network analysis from the text. Use what you’ve learned to answer the questions. Answer these questions based on your area of interest.
Consider the following: Consider the following options for organizing your points: 1) your notes on the stress and coping model, and 2) your notes in response to the network analysis questions.
Make two visuals:
Annotate the stress and coping model as it applies to your social issue and community of interest.
Make a clear illustration of what a network analysis might look like in the context of your social issue and specific community of interest by using your imagination.
What do you think you’ve gotten out of this analysis?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
PSY311 Psychology Project Discussion