Public Opinion on The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Public Opinion on The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
Paper details:
Introduction As discussed in the introduction of this unit, public opinion on the death penalty has changed many times in the United States. An incident such as 9/11 or the Murrah Federal Building bombing can sway public opinion overnight in favor of the death penalty.
The media can affect public opinion on this issue as they can with just about any issue. Suppose for a moment that your child were guilty of and convicted of murder and you had always supported the death penalty, would you support it for your own child? Suppose for a moment that your daughter was brutally raped and murdered and you had always been opposed to the death penalty, would you be opposed to it for the suspect that raped and murdered your own daughter?
Anti-death penalty groups such as Amnesty International would argue that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent. Pro-death penalty groups such as The Heritage Foundation would argue that the death penalty deters crimes and saves lives.
Instructions For this discussion, you will select a pro- or anti-death penalty position, defend it, and support it with references.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Public Opinion on The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
Public Opinion on The Death Penalty Discussion Essay