Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Societal workers must be able to recognize how social structures affect a client’s life. This assignment will help you hone your skills in this area.
In MindTap, watch the assigned video “Home for the Holidays,” which is found in the Topic 1 folder. Expound on the following prompts in 750-1,000 words in relation to the case study. To back up your responses, cite 2-4 scholarly sources:
What social phenomena are visible in this case? Explain them to me.
What theories would a social worker need to be familiar with in order to help the clients in this situation as efficiently as possible?
What are some ways a social worker could apply those theories to assist a client in dealing with these social issues?
In this video case study, use the NASW Code of Ethics to determine the applicable principle(s) that match with ethical practice.
Prepare this work in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which may be found in the Student Success Center. It is not necessary to submit an abstract.
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for successful completion.
This assignment must be completed and submitted to LopesWrite. For more information, see the LopesWrite Technical Support articles.
By the end of Topic 1, turn in the completed assignment.
Information on benchmarks:
The following programmatic competency is assessed in this assignment:
BSS
1.2: Explain how theory aids in the understanding of social phenomena.
(MC3)
The Leadership Mission Critical Domain is evaluated in this assignment.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|