Quantitative Research Designs Time Series Experiment Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Quantitative Research Designs Time Series Experiment Discussion
TO PREPARE FOR THIS DISCUSSION:
For this week’s discussion choose a quantitative research design from the list below.
Pretest/Posttest Control Group Design:
Solomon Four-Group Design:
Posttest Only Control Group Design:
Times Series Experiment:
Equivalent Materials Design:
Nonequivalent Materials Design:
Counterbalanced Designs:
Separate Sample Pretest/Posttest Design:
Multiple Time Series Design:
Recurrent Institutional Cycle Design:
Correlation & Causation:
Retrospective Pretest:
Panel Studies:
Lazarsfeld Sixteenfold Table:
Ex Post Facto Analysis:
For your initial discussion response, post by Day 3 a 3 to 5 paragraph analysis of your assigned quantitative research design. Your analysis should include:
A brief description of the design and where it is most appropriately used
The assumptions for the design
The strengths and weaknesses of the design and the threats to internal and external validity
Analyze the design given in terms of appropriateness, assumptions, strengths and weaknesses, and threats to internal and external validity.
Use a variety of the resources provided in the class as well as resources in the Walden University Library as well as reputable sources found on the internet. Make sure that y
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Quantitative Research Designs Time Series Experiment Discussion
Quantitative Research Designs Time Series Experiment Discussion