Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question of Global Politics and Inequality
Q1
1.What are examples of the disadvantages or costs of inequality that Beddoes mentions? Are there any other drawbacks or prices that you may mention? Explain.
2. What are some of the advantages or advantages of inequality that Beddoes mentions? Are there any other advantages or benefits that you may mention? Explain.
3. For within-country inequality, draw, name, and explain the Kuznets curve (see From U to N explanation on page 3-4). Make sure the x and y axes are labeled. Now add the italics n piece that Beddoes specified, name the years when this shift occurred, and explain what it means.
4. What are Beddoes’ preferred responses to inequity? What solutions, if any, do you prefer (note: you can choose from the several suggested by Beddoes or provide your own or ones not listed by Beddoes)? Explain.
Q2
1. How does Rostow explain the transition from one stage of economic growth to the next?
2. Do you find Rostow’s Stages of Growth compelling, to the best of your knowledge? Do you suppose Rostow has overlooked any key considerations? Explain.
Q3
1. What is/are Andre Gunder Frank’s primary critique(s) of Rostow’s Stages of Economic Growth? Do you think Frank’s criticisms are valid? Explain.
Q4
1. According to Escobar, what epochs, events, or practices best define the historical relationship between the “first” and “third” worlds in the most brief way possible?
2. What are some of the interests that influence first-world development and economic intervention policies and practices, according to Escobar? To put it another way, is third-world development a matter of charity and benevolence, or are there other economic, social, or political interests at stake? Explain.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question of Global Politics and Inequality |
Question of Global Politics and Inequality