Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Questions about project management at Monroe College
Question 1: Please provide a well-thought-out answer to the following debate, citing at least one source (cite using APA).
Consider some examples of internal and external stakeholders in a construction project.
Find an example stakeholder analysis online, share the link, and discuss how it compares to the example provided.
How should a project manager approach the human aspect of change management?
2nd question Select a journal article about project change management and write a 2-3 page review of the topic. Please select a peer-reviewed journal and an article within the last five (5) years that includes the article title, author’s name, and year of publication. The following headings should be included:
Introduction
The article’s summary
The author makes some excellent points.
Commentary on the article
Application of the article’s concepts
Exercise 5B is the third question. “In 2020-2021, should Coca-Cola build, borrow, or buy?” 1st, 2nd, and 3rd steps (To get to Coca-website, Cola’s go to “Press Center,” then “Press Releases.”) Then, as an individual, do Exercise 6A, “Perform a SWOT Analysis for Coca-Cola.”
Questions about project management at Monroe College
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Questions about project management at Monroe College |
Questions about project management at Monroe College