Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Questions about Social Inequality Study
Description: You are required to consider a subject of social inequality that interests you in this task. You might concentrate on a social group or a specific phenomenon that is significant for social inequality investigation. You are asked to discuss structures and methods which sustain this form of inequality and to explicitly focus on at least two professional papers https://academicessly.com/2021/05/2008/bsbwor204-business-technology-maintenance-and-safety/and texts, as they describe the type of inequity that you have chosen (see the Requirements).
You should define the type of inequality, why you think this is important to investigate, review how (at least) two papers describe how this disparity persists and offer summary thoughts on how to understand inequality as far as professional literature is concerned.
Purpose: This task has two purposes. First, this task is a basic aspect of your final paper. Your final paper will study these kinds of inequalities and alternative social arrangements that can minimize stratification. https://iacademicessay.com/2021/06/02/im-working-on-a-communications-question-and-need-guidance-to-help-me-learn-inst/ This “check-in” task challenges you to think about professional literature and your final topic for your final paper.
Secondly, this is an opportunity for you to develop your own professional research of inequality! When preparing a curriculum, educators are required to decide what should be included or excluded. It’s LIKELY that you want to give more consideration to topics and this is your chance! The selection of the books you chose keeps you in a sociological or intellectual perspective.
Requirements: At least two professional sources should be explained as they pertain to the issue in inequality you chose. Through “professional sources,” papers from academic journals reviewed by peer reviewers or authors’ books/chapters that are written on a regular basis in academic journals.
That’s for yourself! It’s pretty easy to find sizzling pictures in Youtube or columns on a subject. Keeping sources confined to peer-reviewed research allows you to know that at least people are based on their viewpoint and do not collect data. Size: 3-5 pages long. https://getacademicessay.com/5542/i percente2% 80% 8% 8% 80% e2% 8% 8% e2% 8% 80% e2% 8% e2% 80% e2% 80% e2% 80% 80% e2% 80% 8d percent 2% 80 percent 8c%2 percent 80 percent 8d%2 percent e2 percent 80% 8d percent e2 percent 80% 80% e2% 80% 80% 80% e2% 80% 80% 8% e2% 8% 85% e2% 80% 80% 80% 80% 8d percent e2 percent 80 percent 8d percent e2 e2 percent 80% 80 percent 8d percent 80 8d% 8d percent 8d percent 8d% 8d percent 8d% e2% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8c% 80 percent 8d% 8d percent 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% 8d% e2% 8d. 8d%
No more than 12pt or double-spaced font.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Questions about Social Inequality Study