Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Any two (2) of the following questions must be answered completely and in full.
Please describe and explain how the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971 altered and controlled the way federal elections are funded and regulated. Any constitutional challenges to the law should be discussed. Please base your response on Bardes (Chapter 9) and the course notes.
Explain and outline Electoral Constituencies Theory as a likely explanation of split governance from the late 1960s to the late 1980s. Be thorough and specific
Please define and explain the term “realignment.” Explain how, beginning in the mid-1990s, realignment aided Republican congressional majorities. Also, please give a different example of realignment than the one you’ll use to explain the GOP’s
congressional election victory. Make your analysis based on both the lecture notes and the Bardes book (ch. 8).
Political action committees (PACs) should be described and explained. Based on federal election campaign finance law, how are they organized and structured? What kind of candidates are likely to receive money from PACs? Why? Please
base your response and analysis on both the interest group lecture notes and the Bardes book (ch.9)
Please explain and examine the Rational Balancing hypothesis. How does it attempt to explain both (a) a split government and (b) the phenomena of the president’s party losing seats in the House of Representatives in practically every m1d
t3rm election since the Civil War? Are there any other possibilities that could account for the m1d t3rm election results?
Questions about the Federal Election Campaign Act
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Questions about the Federal Election Campaign Act |
Questions about the Federal Election Campaign Act