Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Reading Legal Briefings Justice System Discussion
question 1)by Kyndal Townsley – Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 1:12 PM
Number of replies: 3
The President and the Senate have a very large role in selecting the judges. The President has the power to select and nominate the judges he would like. Then this nomination is then sent onto the Senate, where they can either approve or reject this judge. I think politics could into play in this situation, because the Senate is the one that votes on this nomination. If they do not like that person they will not vote for them, but if they like another person then they will vote for them instead. The Senate might have their own standards set for these people that they have to meet in order for the Senate to like them, and vote them into being a judge. Question 2) by Olivia Bell – Monday, April 18, 2022, 1:00 PM
Number of replies: 2
Supreme Court justices make decisions by reading legal briefings and listen to oral arguments. When the Court is all in agreement one of the court justices will be in charge of writing an opinion of the court, but if they all don’t agree there will be a majority opinion and dissenting opinion. Question 3) by Cole Hanks – Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 4:51 PM
Number of replies: 1
Marshall Court gives power to the judicial system to overturn laws that were passed by congress. This rivals what the founding fathers wanted, since it gives a great deal of power to the court system. Since the federal judges don’t have term limits, then the same few judges could drastically keep shutting down laws that went through the difficult process of getting made anyways. The courts were only intended to make judgements if something was unconstitutional or not.
Reading Legal Briefings Justice System Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Reading Legal Briefings Justice System Discussion |
Reading Legal Briefings Justice System Discussion