Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Reading on National Committee for Quality Assurance
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Retrieved http://www.ncqa.org/
Discussion 1
A 2014 independent research study, conducted by RTI International and published in the Health Services Research journal, adds to the evidence that accredited patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) deliver lower cost and drives more appropriate health care utilization.
Please review this study (highlighted in the NCQA website), state its major findings explaining the debate of lowering costs while simultaneously increasing quality.
Reading for discussion 2
1. PESTLE Analysis (great site for analysis information on PESTLE [Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal andEnvironmentalfactors] at http://rapidbi.com/pestle/
2. Porters Five Forces Model at http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/porter.shtml
3. Business Writing and structure from Colorado State University at http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/documents/business_writing/business_intro/
4. Tips for Writing a Job Acceptance Letter: http://money.howstuffworks.com/business/getting-a-job/how-to-write-job-acceptance-letter2.htm
5. Porter’s Five Forces, Jurevicius, O. Strategic Management Insight, May 2013. Retrieved from https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/porters-five-forces.html
Discussion 2
Compare your organization to the industry in accordance with Porter’s five forces model and/or PESTLE. Write no more than 2 sentences for each of Porters five forces and/or PESTLE relative to your selected organization. For example, L/E
for Legal/EthicalWidget shipments to Somewhere Country, Outside USA, must meet customs in U.S., but officials at exit point expect additional pay under the table.
Cite your source(s) and respond to the response below.
Palantir Technologies Inc. PESTLE
Political: Palantir has contracts with the American military which increases their ability to work with American allies and decreases their ability to work with American adversaries. Palantir spent $2,420,000 lobbying and contributed the most to
the Democratic party (Open Secrets, 2020). Palantir has worked with Americas healthcare systems to organize medical staff for COVID-19 cases.
Economic: Palantir has multiple million-dollar contracts with public organizations with the federal government giving them more opportunities to expand in the government sphere. Palantir is starting to work with Airbus with its private software
leading to new opportunities with publicly traded companies. Banks are starting to adopt Palantirs software within their organization to fight fraud.
Social: Palantir has a limited social presence resulting in misunderstandings about their companys software and operations. I hypothesize that Palantir will not spend a lot of resources on its social presence because it is targeting companies and organizations rather than individual consumers.
Technical: The trend of data becoming the new digital gold for advertisers and organizations has created a lucrative opportunity for Palantir to succeed through the utilization of user and organization data. As a result, trends and algorithms
can be developed to increase the productivity and efficiency of the organization while decreases expenses.
Legal: New legal measures and legislature that impact how data can be used may have an impact on the company data Palantir works with, and to what degree they can use the data to make predictions and trends. User data within companies
that align with Palantir may be subject to deceased abilities to work with Palantir. Palantir doesnt solely rely on user data, but on company data of daily operations, production, and manufacturing.
Environmental: Due to Palantir operating entirely through software, they have a limited impact on the environment compared to companies that manufacture and develop products. However, Palantir can have a positive impact on the environment by working with utility companies and companies producing greenhouse gasses to decrease output through its software.
References
Open Secrets. (2020). Palantir Technologies . Retrieved from Open Secrets: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/palantir-technologies/summary?id=D000055177&__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=3138ca40ebe2a476e016b18bf1113932e6e5a430-1625892912-0-AYTBgqYKKgHDpvp5wEiV97G7OkyhxOzaPrc411RyuukMBDjboTyATzjm2mFESLaKFfiCKTkWNHlLgG2va6qaxryopflgUL9hunh9n8
Reading on National Committee for Quality Assurance
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Reading on National Committee for Quality Assurance |
Reading on National Committee for Quality Assurance