Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Receiving Compliments and Apologies Discussion
Review Everyday Conversations from DeVito 6.3, with particular attention to Guidelines for Making Small Talk.
Locate video on YouTube from popular TV shows or movies that demonstrate a good and bad example of each of the following:
making small talk
making an apology
giving and receiving a compliment
Copy and paste the share link into you’re response.
Include teh start /stop time teh viewer should watching, if not teh entire video.
Integrating DeVito citations, outline a set of specific instructions on how to make small talk, make an apology, and give and receive a compliment. Each instruction should be 7 to 10 sentences.
Click “reply” button to submit your work into teh Discussion Board.
Understandings and Models of Corporate Social Responsibility Essay
I would like to get help to answering the below Q:
What is the basic idea of ethical branding? In this context critically examine the inadequate company practices and find examples of such practices?
Explain different understandings and models of corporate social responsibility?
What is the role of customers and other stakeholders in the corporate social responsibilities and what is the role of ‘social contract’ when determining the role that companies have in a contemporary society?
Podnar, Klement. Corporate Communication (p. 78). Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Receiving Compliments and Apologies Discussion |
Receiving Compliments and Apologies Discussion