Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Recommending Evidence-Based Strategies Paper
Write a 2-3-page paper recommending solutions to challenges and opportunities that are based on evidence-based strategies.
ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
In this assessment, you will apply innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches using systems theory to consider forces and impact across the system. Now that you have conducted market data analysis, you will use critical thinking and analysis to recommend solutions that are based on evidence-based strategies discussed in your previous assessment.
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Complete the Evidence-Based Recommendations section of your Course Project Template. Remember that you should be building on the same template you have been submitting for each assessment. This section should be 2–3 pages in length. Address the points below.
Explain how evidence-based strategies were used to address the specific organizational challenges and opportunities that were originally identified in Assessment 1.
Develop a minimum of three logical solutions based on credible evidence (data, insights, best practices, et cetera) to systematically solve the challenges and opportunities to your specific topic within your organization.
Your solutions should apply to all stakeholders and cross-functional departments.
Consider how your solutions impact the organization overall.
Your solutions should be cohesive and integrated with all of your evidence-based strategies.
Determine how to respond effectively to challenges and opportunities through your solutions.
Recommending Evidence-Based Strategies Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Recommending Evidence-Based Strategies Paper |
Recommending Evidence-Based Strategies Paper