Reconsider the R Code for The Dipper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Reconsider the R Code for The Dipper
Reconsider the R code for the dipper example in Section 7.1 for model C/C. (a) Adapt the MCMC code.
Reconsider the R code for the dipper example in Section 7.1 for model C/C.
Adapt the MCMC code to consider the model C/C2, as described in
Section 3.3.1. As usual, use pilot tuning to determine values for the parameters in the proposal distributions.
Extend the code to an RJMCMC algorithm where there are only two model’s C/C and C/C2, adding a subroutine to perform the reversible
jump step (see Example 6.3), outputting the posterior model probabilities with corresponding parameter estimates for each model and making any other necessary modifications to the MCMC code.
Consider the reversible jump step in more detail. Calculate the mean acceptance probability for moving between the two models. Perform a pilot tuning algorithm to find suitable proposal parameters in the reversible jump step.
Suggest alternative reversible jump updating algorithms (in terms of proposal distributions used and/or bijective function for moving between the different models) that may improve the efficiency of the reversible jump step, and how this may be assessed.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Reconsider the R Code for The Dipper
Reconsider the R Code for The Dipper