Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Regulation of Internet and Right of Technology Privacy
Directions
You are required to answer both part A and B: (I think you will find this discussion relevant – it should give rise to some interesting debates on the Discussion Board!
PART A:
Give an example of three of the six settings in which the law applies to conducting business on the internet and your personal experience with each. Did you feel you were legally protected? Were you aware of what your legal protections were?
(Check your book!)
AND
PART B:
Read
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in City of Ontario, California V. Quoin at http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1332.pdf (Links to an external site.)
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in City of Ontario, California V. Quoin summary athttp://www.palaborandemploymentblog.com/2010/06/articles/public-employers-1/supreme-court-issues-highly-anticipated-city-of-ontario-v-quon-decision/ (Links to an external site.)
The Article by Adam Lipkin that appeared in the New York Times at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/us/politics/22scotus.html (Links to an external site.)
The Article by Justin Juvenal that appeared in the Washington Post on August 9,2012, “If you hit “like”, is that Free Speech?” Front page.http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/a-facebook-court-battle-is-liking-something-protected-free-speech/2012/08/08/538314fe-e179-11e1-ae7f-d2a13e249eb2_story.html (Links to an external site.)
Answer the following:
What did the Court rule with regard to the California police department right to audit the text messages on a pager the city had issued a police officer?
Did the Court hold that an employee has no right to privacy in the work place?
Do you agree or disagree with the decision – why or why not?
Given the Supreme Court’s ruling in City of Ontario – what do you think of the lawsuit in VA regarding whether hitting “like” is protected free speech? How do you think the court will rule in this case?
Reply to at least two of your classmates using the discussion grading criteria below. (Updating later)
Grading
This assignment is worth 25 points toward your course grade. You will receive full credit for posting your introduction as directed. Please see the grading rubric below.
Grading Criteria | Points |
Discussion Forum Response
Addressed all requirements/answered all questions. Wrote substantive postings of 1 or 2 paragraphs (6 – 8 sentences) for each. |
10 points |
Use of Terms and Ideas Learned
Used terms from chapter correctly where appropriate. Used ideas from chapter correctly (with citation) to clarify, explain, or support an argument. |
5 points |
Contribution to Discussion
Replied in thoughtful, meaningful, and helpful ways. Advanced the discussion whenever possible. |
5 points |
Response to posting of other students
Responses to posting of two students |
5 points |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Regulation of Internet and Right of Technology Privacy |
Regulation of Internet and Right of Technology Privacy