Relationship between Corporate Planning and Strategic Management Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Relationship between Corporate Planning and Strategic Management Discussion
Please read the following Harvard Business Review – MIT Sloan Management Review Article: .Your Detailed – Comprehensive Summary for THIS article post should be no less of 1,700 words. . 2. Which are the three most CRITICAL ISSUES of THIS article? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail … For EACH Critical Issue please post at least two strong comprehensive paragraphs . 3. Which are the three most relevant LESSONS LEARNED of THIS article? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail … For EACH Lesson Learned please post at least two strong comprehensive paragraphs . 4. Which are the three most important BEST PRACTICES of THIS article? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail … For EACH Best Practice please post at least two strong comprehensive paragraphs . 5. How can you relate THIS article with the TOPICS COVERED in class? Please explain, analyze, and discuss in great detail … . 6. Do you see any alignment of the concepts described in THIS article with the class concepts reviewed in class? Which are those alignments and misalignments? Why? Please explain, analyze, and discuss in great detail … .
1 attachments
Leadership Styles Business Paper
Develop and write a 4 to 6-page, APA-formatted paper that a) compares and b) contrasts the leadership styles and scope of influence of two (2) historical figures. Remember, this is to be a perspective on leadership that requires you to perform research and analysis into how these leaders viewed themselves, and how others viewed them.
Introduction
State what made each an effective leader
Describe how each influence the lives of others positively and/or negatively
Include how will each be remembered in history
Provide leadership similarities and differences of the two leaders
Discuss if you consider either of them servant-leader types
Conclusion (With the textbook and at least six [6] peer-reviewed sources)
Include in-text citations and a References page, which includes at least four academic sources.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Relationship between Corporate Planning and Strategic Management Discussion
Relationship between Corporate Planning and Strategic Management Discussion