Relationship between Followership and Leadership Styles
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Relationship between Followership and Leadership Styles
Prepare this report in APA format that details your research and assessment findings and conclusions, and your development plan for each phase of this project.
The sections (include the section titles in your paper according to APA format) required for this report are as follows:
- a) Title Page [unique title and not title of this assignment – do reference your major in the title, however]
- b) Abstract
- c) Introduction
- d) Relationship between Followership and Leadership Styles and their Traits
- e) Followership and Leadership Expectations in [name of professional field]
- f) Followership and Leadership Assessment
- g) Followership and Leadership Development Plan
- h) Conclusion
- i) References
APA format resource: Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL) – APA Style Guide This APA style guide is the standard reference for Southwestern College Professional Studies and is an excellent resource to help guide you in the creation of your APA formatted Followership/Leadership mastery assignment. Research:
You will research scholarly and professional journal articles on followership and leadership topics in Deets Library, from Open Access Journals, your educational course materials (textbooks etc. ), and from professional associations written 6 Revision – July 2, 2019 within the last ten years. For this research, news sources, general information Websites, encyclopedias, or other similar sources may not be used.
References: The minimum number of references overall for the complete assignment is: 18 (your research that provides a minimum number of 12 references combined with 6 provided materials combines for a total of 18.) Cited In Unit New research Provided
Unit 1: minimum references (4 provided and 5 from research) 9 5 4
Unit 2: minimum number from new research (different from unit 1 references) 5 5 0 (and include at least 3 used in Unit 1 in addition to 5 new) 3
Unit 3: minimum of 5 references from Units 1 and 2 (no new research) 5 0 2 and cite the assessments as part of the minimum 2
Unit 4: minimum of 2 references from new research
Your reference page should include your sources gained from research and the sources provided (the four articles and the assessments). Age of your references from research: they must be published within the last 10 years. 3. Within each of sections d-g, each of the section objectives/instructions must be carefully addressed in this report. Be sure to carefully review the grading rubric below.
Do note that this is a professional report, so use of writing voice and contractions, etc. should follow APA format.
- Units 1 and 2 should be written in third person.
- Units 3 and 4 can be written in first person according to APA since you will be presenting and analyzing your personal data. 4. The minimum word length, excluding the title page, abstract, and references, is 2500 words. More than likely, you will exceed this minimum word length, given the scope and requirements of this project. 5. Submit your report for grading and feedback by Sunday of Unit 5
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results