Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Relationship Development and Deterioration
Video: 500 Days of Summer
Trace the development of the relationship between Tom and Summer through the developmental stages of romantic relationships. If they do not reach a certain stage, you must explain why. Provide two examples per applicable stage.
Initiating:
1.
2.
Experimenting:
1.
2.
Intensifying:
1.
2.
Integrating:
1.
2.
Bonding:
1.
2.
Trace the deterioration and termination of the relationship in the course of the movie through the deterioration phases of romantic relationships. If they do not reach a certain stage, you must explain why. Provide two examples per applicable stage.
Differentiating:
1.
2.
Circumscribing:
1.
2.
Stagnating:
1.
2.
Avoiding:
1.
2.
Terminating:
1.
2.
Find a dialectical tension that Tom and Summer go through in the film (integration-separation, stability-change, expression-privacy). Describe each characters behavior and why they are on one side of the tension. Next, which strategy do they implement to solve their tension? If they did not solve the tension, how would you have solved the tension?
Provide an example from Tom and Summers relationship that reinforces the 7 reasons why we form relationships:
Appearance:
Similarity:
Complementary:
Rewards:
Competency:
Proximity:
Disclosure:
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results