Report of Market Stock Game Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Report of Market Stock Game
Requirements
(5) It is important that you take some time to familiarize yourself with the details of the game. You can find the details on the game website after you sign-up. You also need to familiarize yourself with the trading process if you have not traded any stocks earlier. (6) You will have $100,000 to invest. You need to pick at least 2 individual stocks (you can pick more if you like) per team member for investment during the game period. You do not have to buy them all at once, but you can make investments at different points in time. Note that you do not have to invest the entire $100,000 amount in these stocks; you can keep some money in cash or other investments if you like. (7) You can buy and sell as many times as you like. There are no trading commissions. (8) As we proceed through the course, you will learn new things about investing. Check your portfolio throughout the semester to see how can apply newly acquired knowledge to improve the performance of your portfolio. (9) During the last week of the semester, you will submit a report. The report will describe what stocks you traded in during the game period (name of the company, ticker symbol, and student who picked the stock), the criteria you used to buy or sell particular stocks (in particular, you need to highlight what you learned during the course to improve your trading performance), a description of your portfolio performance, and if you would do anything different in future trading to further improve your performance. (10) Your project grade will be based primarily on how thorough you were in your analysis of the stocks you chose and the portfolio you formed, and not on the performance of your portfolio. Remember that I am more interested in whether you applied the concepts and not so much in how well your portfolio did.
(11) You will gain the most out of this project if you think as if you have invested your own
$100,000 for this project. Think about how careful you would be if it was your own money and use that same caution and prudent judgments in making your trading decisions. All of us make mistakes, but it is better to make mistakes with fake money rather than real money, and this project provides you an opportunity to learn from your mistakes for your future investments
Note: I did play 2 stocks Tesla and NVDA…Please look at my screen shots below of my performance started 9/15-12/6 so you can write a report of this Stock game follow the instruction and requirements above. I ended up Rank 2 and just only had 2 transactions of buying. At the beginning, I bought 100 shares of Tesla and 100 shares od NVDA stock on 9/15 and maintained during that period un till the game ends 12/6. I did not sell or buy more after that. You can check the details that I screenshotted below that has the details of profits everyday. That is the idea will help you find my strategy maintaining holding these stocks.
Please look at my profit and find the primarily on how thorough I was in my analysis of the stocks I chose and the portfolio I formed, and not on the performance of my portfolio.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results