Report on Crystallographic Symmetry
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
GEOL 311: Mineralogy is a course in mineralogy.
Assignment for LAB 2: Crystallographic Symmetry
The deadline is the week of September 17th, 2018.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
LAB 2’S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
– Acquire the ability to inspect crystals and become familiar with their systems and symmetry.
Assignment Grade
/10 Crystal Systems
/10 Crystal Symmetry
Total /20
Crystal Systems (A) (10 points)
Draw and label the distinguishing components of each crystal system to the best of your ability. Describe the relationship between the axis (a,b,c) and the angle (,,). Correct content, not artistry, earns you points. In each system, list one or two minerals.
1) Isometric measurement
2) Orthorhombic symmetry
3) Tetragonal symmetry
4) Monoclinic condition
6) Triclinic Clinic
Symmetry (B) (10 points)
We’ll work on symmetry operations in this section. Visually analyze the provided crystal models, assess their symmetry content, record it in Hermann-Mauguin (H-M) notation, and determine the crystal system and shape name in the table below.
H-M Symbol Crystal System Shape Name # Symmetry ContentReport on Crystallographic Symmetry
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Report on Crystallographic Symmetry
Report on Crystallographic Symmetry