Research About Language Aquisition Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Research About Language Aquisition Assignment
I am african and my son is african. research about language aquisition 8 – 10 pages!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you have a young child, keep a daily journal of sounds, words, or sentences produced by the child. Compare your data to information about language acquisition.
this is a 10 page paper!
you cannot use any outside sources but the ones I provide!
Final Project Data
Final project proposal (in about 150-250 words) state the research question and what your original research will be. Be sure to narrow the question to something that you can discuss in-depth in a short (8-10 page paper).
References APA
Look over all the assigned readings. Choose the ones related to your research topic. Create References APA style. Use this link as a guideline.
HYPERLINK “https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/” https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/
You should have about 5-8 sources. Please use the readings from the course for the majority of your sources if at all possible as you will be comparing the results of your original research to the data presented in this class.
References Checklist
Entries are alphabetized by author’s last name.
Entries use author’s initials for first and middle names.
Dates of publication appear after the author’s name and are in parenthesis.
Titles only have first words and proper nouns capitalized.
Titles of articles have not punctuations.
Titles of periodicals and books and stand along publications are in italics.
References are double-spaced throughout and only double-spaced (MS Word will add extra space after each paragraph, so you have to remove that manually).
Use hanging indent: Second and third lines are indented .5.
Outline for final paper
I suggest the following outline for the final paper
Introduction—defines and clarifies the problem
Summarizes previous investigations in order to inform the reader of the state of current research
Identify gaps in research or contradictions
Review your research/analysis
Discussion—interpretation and discussion of the implications of the results
Here are some youtube videos that you might find useful.
Attributable cost is a cost per unit
mission costing is the reverse of traditional techniques: under this scheme a func- tional budget is determined now by the demands of the missions it serves. Thus in Figure 3.9 the cost per mission is identified horizontally and from this the functional budgets may be determined by summing vertically. Given that the logic of mission costing is sound, how might it be made to work in practice? This approach requires firstly that the activity centres associated with a particular distribution mission be identified, e.g. transport, warehousing, inventory, etc., and secondly that the incremental costs for each activity centre incurred as a result of undertaking that mission must be isolated. Incremental costs are used because it is important not to take into account ‘sunk’ costs or costs that would still be incurred even if the mission were abandoned. We can make use of the idea of ‘attributable costs’8 to operationalise the concept:
Attributable cost is a cost per unit that could be avoided if a product or func- tion were discontinued entirely without changing the supporting organisation structure.
In determining the costs of an activity centre, e.g. transport, attributable to a specific mission, the question should be asked: ‘What costs would we avoid if this customer/ segment/channel were no longer serviced?’ These avoidable costs are the true incremental costs of servicing the customer/segment/channel. Often they will be sub- stantially lower than the average cost because so many distribution costs are fixed and/or shared. This approach becomes particularly powerful when combined with a customer revenue analysis, because even customers with low sales offtake may still be prof- itable in incremental costs terms if not on an average cost basis. In other words the company would be worse off if those customers were abandoned. Such insights as this can be gained by extending the mission costing concept to produce profitability analyses for customers, market segments or distribution channels. The term ‘customer profitability accounting’ describes any attempt to relate the revenue produced by a customer, market segment or distribution chan- nel to the costs of servicing that customer/segment/channel.
Customer profitability analysis
One of the basic questions that conventional accounting procedures have difficulty answering is: ‘How profitable is this customer compared to another?’ Usually cus- tomer profitability is only calculated at the level of gross profit – in other words the net sales revenue generated by the customer in a period, less the cost of goods sold for the actual product mix purchased. However, there are still many other costs to take into account before the real profitability of an individual customer can be exposed. The same is true if we seek to identify the relative profitability of different market seg- ments or distribution channels.
M E A S U R I N G LO G I S T I C S C O S T S A N D P E R F O R M A N C E 73
The significance of these costs that occur as a result of servicing custom- ers can be profound in terms of how logistics strategies should be developed. Customer profitability analysis will often reveal a proportion of customers who make a negative contribution, as in Figure 3.10. The reason for this is very simply that the costs of servicing a customer can vary considerably – even between two customers who may make equivalent purchases from us.
If we think of all the costs that a company incurs from when it captures an order from a customer to when it collects the payment, is will be apparent that the total figure could be quite high. It will also very likely be the case that there will be signif- icant differences in these costs customer by customer. At the same time, different customers will order a different mix of products so the gross margin that they gen- erate will differ. As Table 3.1 highlights, there are many costs that need to be identified if cus- tomer profitability is to be accurately measured. The best measure of customer profitability is to ask the question: ‘What costs would I avoid and what revenues would I lose if I lost this customer?’ This is the concept of ‘avoidable’ costs and incremental revenue. Using this principle helps circumvent the problems that arise when fixed costs are allocated against individ- ual customers.
Research About Language Aquisition Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow