Research Evaluation Form Individual and Learning Team
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Research Evaluation Form Individual and Learning Team
Research Evaluation Form CCMH/525 Version 3
1 University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________ Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
None _________ Home ________ Clinic _________ Lab __________
Residential facility _________ School _________ Hospital _________ Other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Method
Sample size (total): ________________ Size per group or cell: _______________
Consider the following questions:
_______ Were the methods described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
Subjects
_______ Were subject recruitments and selection methods described?
_______ Were subjects randomly selected? Were there any biases in sampling?
_______ Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
_______ Were characteristics of the sample adequately described?
_______ Are two or more groups being compared? Are they shown to be comparable on potentially confounding variables? If they are not comparable, is this incomparability handled properly?
_______ Was informed consent obtained?
_______ Was the size of the sample large enough for the number of measures and for the effect being sought?
Research Design
_______ Single group, time series study
_______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________
_______ Single group, no measurement
_______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____
_______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned
_______ (Quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group,
not randomly assigned
_______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship
_______ Descriptive research (qualitative study)
_______ Natural observation
_______ Analytical research
_______ Interview research
_______ Historical study
_______ Survey research
_______ Legal study
_______ Ethnography research
_______ Policy analysis
_______ Fieldwork research
_______ Evaluation study
_______ Phenomenology
_______ Grounded theory
_______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)
_______ Case study, no measurement
_______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________
_______ Developmental research
_______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over a period of time)
_______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared)
_______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time)
_______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons
_______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls
_______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA)
_______ Other design: __________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
__no_____ If appropriate, was a control group used?
_______ Was the control method for the study appropriate?
_______ For what variable was being controlled?
___no____ In the case of an experimental study, were subjects randomly assigned to groups?
Measures
Type of dependent measures or instruments used: __Parents and eventually children were questioned about anxiety. The anxiety was reviewed in three intervals; ages 6, 10, 15. At 15 the child was able to self-report on anxiety levels. Up until that time it was parental discretion and their views on anxiety levels within the home. The study included stepfathers as well as biological. There was some video observation by trained researchers for problem solving skills. ________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Measurement or instrument validity information: _Anxiety was appropriately measured with the parents during the first two intervals, as child was not old enough to self-report. Parents could report on environment, marital issues, etc.______________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Measurement or instrument reliability information: _The method appears to have been reliable, providing parents were honest in their answers. Various anxiety levels were present each set and varied per parent set as well; primarily based off of their own personal observations. ____________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
__yes_____ For all measures—measures to classify subjects, dependent variables, and so forth—was evidence of reliability and validity provided, either through summarizing the data or by referring the reader to an available source for that information?
____yes___ Do the reliability and validity data justify the use of the measure? Specific evidence is particularly important if a measure is created just for this particular study.
__yes_____ Do the measures match the researchers questions and hypothesis being addressed?
_______ In the case that different tasks or measures are used, was their order counterbalanced? Do the researchers analyze for potential order effects?
_yes_____ Are multiple measures used, particularly those that sample the same domains or constructs but with different methods, such as self-report, rating scales, self-monitoring, or direct observation?
___no____ If human observers, judges, or raters were involved, was inter-observer or inter-rater agreement (reliability) assessed? Was it obtained for a representative sample of the data? Did the two raters do their ratings independently? Was their reliability satisfactory?
Independent and Dependent Variables
Independent variables: ________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dependent variables: __________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Data Analysis
Scales of Measurement:
Nominal _______ Ordinal _______ Interval _______ Ratio _______
What type of statistical techniques are used?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What type of tables and graphs are used?
_____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ Do the data fulfill the assumptions and requirements of the statistics?
_______ Were tests of significance used and reported appropriately, such as with sufficient detail to understand what analysis was being conducted?
_______ In correlation studies, did the researchers interpret low but significant correlations as though they indicated a great deal of shared variance between the measures? Are the correlations limited by restricted ranges on one or more measures? Are means and standard deviations provided so that you may determine this?
_______ Do the researchers report means and standard deviations, if relevant, so that the reader can examine whether statistically significant differences are large enough to be meaningful?
Limitations of the study: ________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion
Summary and conclusions (usefulness): ____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ Do the researchers discuss marginally or insignificant results as though they were significant?
_______Do the researchers over-interpret the data? For example, do they use casual language to integrate correlation findings or consider self-report of behavior to be equivalent to direct observation?
_______Do the researchers consider alternative explanations for the findings?
_______Do the researchers have a humility section that describes the limitations of the research?
_______Do the researchers point out aspects of subject selection, procedures, and dependent variables that limit generalizability of the findings?
Rate the writing style on a scale of 1 to 10:
Overall clarity? 1————-5————-10
Easy to read? 1————-5————-10
Organized? 1————-5————-10
Describe what you learned from the study:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
___________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
___________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
*Adapted from form created by Dr. Randy Buckner, University of Phoenix instructor
Copyright © 2017, 2015 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Research Evaluation Form Individual and Learning Team
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Research Evaluation Form Individual and Learning Team