Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Research project Human Subject
The Clinic of Research:
https://ori.hhs.gov/TheResearchClinicVideo/
Click Jan Klein, RN to play. Work your way through the short movies, selecting the best response for research support from the RN.
When you finish your films, you will submit a Word file summarizing the key parts of informed agreement, particular populations that require specific legal and ethical research considerations and the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research scenarios.
It should be about 300-400 words in your synopsis. Provide a minimum of 2 references to support your summary in APA format.
Objectives
Understand the history underlying the establishment of rules on human subjects
Identifying and describing the three principles in the Belmont report on ethical human topics research
In order to identify hazards associated with research participation and suitable risk protection, vulnerable populations who need specific protection and instances where human Research is free from regulatory restrictions.
Identify the important aspects of the https://youtu.be/174SkSszRVg informed consent form
Describe the role of the nurse in the field of research
Specifications: 300-400 words
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Research project Human Subject