Responsibility for Implementing Projects Discussion Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Responsibility for Implementing Projects Discussion Assignment
In a business environment, there are many different internal audiences with whom you may communicate, including various departments, different levels of management, and groups with different levels of technical expertise. There are also external audiences, including customers and contractors. Within these audiences, you will also need to consider differences in group dynamics, such as culture.
In your initial post, identify one audience that you may communicate with for business purposes. Then discuss the following questions about this audience:
Does this audience have technical expertise? If so, what is their level of expertise?
How diverse is this audience? Note at least one common difference in the dynamics of this group.
Are there any language considerations that need to be made when communicating with this audience?
What are the audience’s expectations?
Imagine that you are writing an email to a member of this audience. How would you go about crafting that communication? What would you include and exclude? What communications decisions would you make?
In response to your peers, offer additional analysis or insight into the expertise, diversity, language, and expectations of your peers’ audiences. Consider whether the considerations detailed would lead to an effective email communication with the noted audience.
HERE IS IT : I have spent many years in a support role. I was communicating often with the consumer/end user. The end user audience is very hard to gauge what kind of technical experience they have.
Usually a short phone call or face -to- face meeting will help greatly in this. When this activity is not possible, I would have to assume what technical level the end user was on. Unfortunately, the level I found myself using more often than not was a very low remedial technical level. That is not to say that the end user is not smart, but they may lack greatly in the technical field.
When conversing with the end user you will run the gambit of technical knowledge. The end user audience is about as diverse as you can get. If they are at a high level of understanding, then I could skip over the more remedial (How To) instructions and conversations. This part of the audience understands what I would be trying to communicate.
Therefore, it was much less task oriented and much more instructional. The end result was always the same throughout those experiences. The end users wanted clarity, task instructions, or to better understand the product they were using.
When I was creating an email for the consumers, I would usually start off with a paragraph or two to explain the situation. Then I would create a ‘How To’ sheet for their specific issue. This would include steps to do accompanied by pictures. Then I would ask if this was help and if they now have a better understanding of the issue.
POST
Here is the second peer to respond to : Hello again everyone, To communicate effectively, you must adapt to your audience; therefore, you must know your audience (Audience, 2014). This statement holds true in everyday conversation as well as business and technical communications.
For instance, working at Verizon I would not describe the latest technology to our customers the same way I would with my boss and colleagues. I also would not promote it to a 65-year-old the same way I would a 20-year-old. You must adapt your communication standards to that of the audience you are delivering to. When you communicate, the purpose is not what you want to do but instead is what you want your audience to do because of reading what you wrote or listening to what you said (Audience, 2014).
In the business environment, we communicate with many different types of people daily, the level of expertise on a given topic will vary amongst all these people and knowing how to relay the necessary information is essential. According to the course textbook, the 3 main audiences we speak with in business are high tech audience, low tech audience and lay audience.
Communication could also be directed to a combination of any of these audiences. For my discussion I will focus on the low-tech audience. Low-tech readers are familiar with the technology you are writing about, but their job responsibilities are peripheral to the subject matter. They either work in another department, manage you, work under your supervision, or work outside your company (Gerson, 2016).
In my company, our low-tech audience would be our sales and customer service associates. This audience will have limited to no technical expertise and the audience will be very diverse. If I am only communicating with just my location, there would be no language barriers; however, as a global company, if I had to reach out to other locations, I would come across colleagues who may not speak English as their native language. In email communications, I would not include any specific department words and jargon. I would not use any highly technical words that could be exclusive to our high-tech audiences.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Responsibility for Implementing Projects Discussion Assignment
Responsibility for Implementing Projects Discussion Assignment