Review and Reflect Chapter 9 Adult Sexual Relationships Assignment

March 22, 2022

Review and Reflect Chapter 9 Adult Sexual Relationships Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Review and Reflect Chapter 9 Adult Sexual Relationships Assignment

Forecasting and Caption 1As we are discovering, Cost Benefit Analysis is based on assumptions about financial forecasts of future cash flows and expenses. Since the future is unknown, getting consensus on inputs can often be the most challenging part of running a Cost Benefit Analysis. In Assignment 2, we find five colleagues who each have very different views of the future.

Referencing our readings this week and drawing on your own personal experiences, answer the following questions:

Why do skilled professionals working in the same business often have significantly different forecasts and views of the future? Share an example from your own work experience where your colleagues had very different forecasts for the same item.

How can we make better use of data (past performance, industry outlook, etc.) to improve our forecasts and resolve disagreements?

Would “sensitivity analysis” have helped Management understand the potential variations driven by changes in assumptions?

After the forecast is complete, describe the communication process you would use to convey results and successes to stakeholders, lenders, and employees.

OR –
Option 2As you’re learning in Assignment 2, a key technique in managerial accounting/finance is the use of “Cost Benefit Analysis” to help management make better business decisions.

Define this approach in your own words and discuss 2 applications of this concept in your current work environment (examples might include make vs. buy, plant location, new product or packaging, downsizing, acquisition/divestiture, etc.).

Discuss a variable or assumption within the project where the data was difficult to obtain — and what you did to develop a reasonable assumption for the project economics.

Additionally, share or create one example where using financial data and cost benefit analysis that did, or could have, led to a better decision.

Post your initial response by Wednesday, midnight of your time zone, and reply to at least 2 of your classmates’ initial posts by Sunday, midnight of your time zone.

1st person to respond to

Phi

RE: Week 9 Discussion COLLAPSE

Hello Professor/Classmates,

I chose Option 2 this week.

Forecasting and cost-benefit analysis are two words that are often associated with Acquisition and Government Contracting. As stewards of the taxpayers’ dollars, interested parties (Epos, 1) must exercise due diligence in establishing government estimates by looking at previous buys, historical data, and market changes. In 2020 DoDs Inspector General reported on ten operational or management challenges; Challenge #9 (2) was among them.

Acquisitions from a government perspective are the procuring of a product, service, and construction at a fair and reasonable price (Best Value). Many layers and steps go into this process. The following is a snapshot of generating and shaping a requirement and benefit analysis is the critical part of the process. This process can involve a PDT (Project Development Team) or a few individuals based on complexity.\
Fig #1

Buy vs lease is another application and can be viewed as a subset of the overall acquisition process. Leasing by the government can be broken down into two types:

a capital lease (lease to ownership) and an operating lease (lease with an option-to-own). Typical examples are vehicle fleet and office space.

Lease agreements may be unbreakable, and in many cases, the organization must continue to pay for it for the duration of the lease. In our present office, the pandemic made it difficult for management to identify assumptions (Bitnet, 3) on whether we needed the current space or decreased due to many staff teleworking 100%. With back-to-work policies looming, consideration had to be given on how small, or large the office footprint (50%, 75%, etc.) would be. Confirming and committing to a percentage, we could then use our experience that we had to go through to recommend to our customers’ ways to modify contracts at their locations to decrease occupancy and lease rates and terminate for convenience as a last resort.

The government does not do a great job of providing reasonable estimates for work to be done; therefore, much waste accumulates. Understanding the budget and the expenses combined with a steady utilization rate could have led to a better decision and a timely one.

Phil

References

JWI530. Week 9. Video. Forecasting.
Inspector General Report (2020). Top DOD Management Challenges. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2020/Mar/11/2002263093/-1/-1/1/TOP%20DOD%20MANAGEMENT%20CHALLENGES%20FISCAL%20YEAR%202020.PDF

Review and Reflect Chapter 9 Adult Sexual Relationships Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met