Risk Management Information Gathering Exercise
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Risk Management Information Gathering Exercise
Question 1
- Prior to the Risk Management Information Gathering Exercise discussed earlier in the
case, consider the challenges of the newly formed project team in undertaking Risk Management
in such a situation.
- (a) Discuss the challenges and how each of the departments might interact with and
support Risk Management across the organization.
(b) What are the major differences between IT and Project Management, considering
they were both part of the initial Risk Management pilot? How might they have overcome
this?
- (a) What do you think were the major positives of the approach undertaken with regard
to the risk management information gathering exercise?
(b) What do you think were the challenges and pitfalls of gathering data in the way that
they did?
- What are the key challenges to the risk framework and risk approach proposed in 2011
by the risk management team?
- Despite Operational Excellence providing the perfect platform to push Risk Management,
discuss what the potential pitfalls may be.
- Using the supporting documentation along with the case study information (Exhibits
20.9, 20.10, 20.11, and 20.12), provide a list of potential corporate risks that might have
been identified by the project team.
Instructions for Question 1
Write around 2 pages
No Copy Paste
Add Citation with references
Find Chapter 20 in below link for reference
http://3.droppdf.com/files/l545g/implementing-enterprise-risk-management.pdf
Question 2
Chapter 22 presented a case study in creating value from uncertainty, and chapter 25 presented the use of efficient frontier analysis in SRM. Assume you are the project lead for the analysis team that uses Efficient Frontier Analysis to evaluate risks of the portfolio presented in chapter 25. How would you explain the results of the analysis to non-technical decision makers? What recommendation would you make, assuming the risk appetite presented in chapter 25?
To complete this assignment, you must ANSWER ALL OF THE QUESTIONS Below Mentioned
Create a new thread. As indicated above, assume you are the project lead for the analysis team that uses Efficient Frontier Analysis to evaluate risks of the portfolio presented in chapter 25. How would you explain the results of the analysis to non-technical decision makers? What recommendation would you make, assuming the risk appetite presented in chapter 25?
Instructions for Question 2
Write around 300-350 words
No Copy Paste
Add Citation with references
Find Chapter 22 & Chapter 25 in below link for reference
http://3.droppdf.com/files/l545g/implementing-enterprise-risk-management.pdf
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results