Role of A New Healthcare Worker For The CDC
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Role of A New Healthcare Worker For The CDC
Project
In 2014 there was a major outbreak of Ebola in western Africa. Healthcare workers from around the world responded and were subsequently exposed, some losing their life to the disease. There was widespread concern from home countries about the possible spread of this disease out of the quarantined area and globally. Such epidemics are a health thread that stretches well beyond the initial outbreak site. This has occurred also with SARS, Bird Flu, and MERS. With the easy and speed of global transportation, it has increased the likelihood of an outbreak spreading even before it has been established that it is a threat. In addition to infectious disease threats, there are other emergencies that threaten the health of a community, state, or country such as natural disasters, bioterrorism, chemical emergencies, blast injuries, radiation emergencies, etc). This means that countries and local communities must be prepared to protect the health of the citizens.
You will assume the role of a new healthcare worker for the CDC. You will investigate the risks, needs, resources, and services that would be needed in the case of a widespread outbreak in a community of your choice. This will include:
assessing the community
determining the possible risks and weak points in the health system
determining the current and needed resources and services
developing a plan of action in the event of an outbreak or emergency either from within the country or from a global source.
You will have one deliverable. A oral report (powerpoint) given to the local community leaders, that addresses the points above.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results