Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Safety Act 2020 Research Case Study Essay
Assume that the Cemetery Safety Act 2020 received Royal Assent on 1 January 2020. No commencement date is stated in the legislation.
When introducing the Bill into Parliament the Minister of Transport stated:
“Due to the increase in serious accidents, personal injury and death, caused by people bringing their cars on to cemetery grounds this new piece of legislation is vitally important. In addition, during serious times of grieving and bereavement the last thing that mourners want is to be interrupted by the sound of vehicles.”
Section 2(1) of the Act states:
In this Act:
cemetery means any land held, taken, purchased, acquired, set apart, dedicated, or reserved exclusively for the burial of the dead generally.
emergency services means Ambulance, Civil Defense and Fire services.
medical practitioner means a health practitioner who—
is registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand as a practitioner of the profession of medicine; and
holds a current practicing certificate.
vehicle means anything equipped with wheels or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved for the purpose of carrying a person or persons.
Section 7 states:
“Subject to section 13, no person shall drive any car, van, bus or other vehicle within cemetery grounds.”
Section 9 states:
“Every person who contravenes section 7 of this Act commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to a term of community service not exceeding 1 month.”
Section 13 states:
“Emergency service vehicles are exempt from the obligation in section 7.”
Section 14 states:
“Any vehicle belonging to a medical practitioner is deemed to be an emergency service vehicle.”
On 2 January 2020, Kiri went to visit her mother’s grave. She is disabled and uses her motorized wheelchair within the cemetery to reach the gravesite. However, while distracted by some small children she crashes into an elderly man causing him to fall and break his arm.
The police and ambulance services arrive 10 minutes later and drive on to the cemetery grounds. Andrew, a newly trained police officer is driving his police motorcycle and accidently hits a teenager who is running over to where the elderly man was injured by Kiri’s wheelchair.
Yunong, a doctor on holiday from Australia, is also passing by at the time in her rental car and sees all the commotion and the ambulance. Being nosey she drives into the cemetery. After parking she goes over to the crowd gathered around the old man.
Kiri, Andrew and Yunong have all been reported to the police.
REQUIRED:
By referring to both general approaches to judicial approaches to statutory interpretation, intrinsic and extrinsic aids for interpretation and also any relevant maxims of interpretation, advise whether Kiri, Andrew and Yunong are likely to be found guilty of committing an offence under the Cemetery Safety Act 2020, and the possible consequences.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Safety Act 2020 Research Case Study Essay |
Safety Act 2020 Research Case Study Essay