Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper details:
The purpose of the assignment is to work through the same thinking process that a school-based leadership team would do as they analyze student data and develop a plan that will move the school forward. Use the Data action Team guidelines from your text as you develop this assignment. Step 2: Determine with which schools data you will be working Step 3: Access your most recent test data via the DOE interactive website Step 4: Conduct an analysis of the aggregated and disaggregated result Step 5: Develop a detailed summary of results that includes: highlights the highs and lows of the school-wide test results Illustrates the overall score results for the subgroups Examines the different tests by subject Identifies the areas of greatest need Step 6: Develop an improvement plan that targets the greatest need areas. Be sure to include: how you intend to monitor the implementation of the plan how you will evaluate the success of the plan. Research that supports your ideas for improvement Step 7: Include a reflection of how this process connects with the core value of integrity This paper should be written in APA format. MUST USE TEXTBOOK
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
school-based leadership team 522 week 7 paper |
school-based leadership team 522 week 7 paper